Comments on: Periodic Table http://www.hrsfans.org/2009/11/15/periodic-table/ misce stultitiam consiliis brevem Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:57:13 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Emily Morgan http://www.hrsfans.org/2009/11/15/periodic-table/comment-page-1/#comment-5537 Emily Morgan Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:17:19 +0000 http://www.hrsfans.org/?p=407#comment-5537 It seems either is acceptable: "The actinoid (IUPAC nomenclature) or actinide (traditional nomenclature still in wide use) series..." (from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actinide) Though the -IDES versions obviously get bonus points for reference to Caesar. =) It seems either is acceptable: “The actinoid (IUPAC nomenclature) or actinide (traditional nomenclature still in wide use) series…” (from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actinide)

Though the -IDES versions obviously get bonus points for reference to Caesar. =)

]]> By: Jinnayah http://www.hrsfans.org/2009/11/15/periodic-table/comment-page-1/#comment-5531 Jinnayah Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:51:27 +0000 http://www.hrsfans.org/?p=407#comment-5531 I kind of hate to sound pedantic, and I hate far more that it took me a few weeks to notice this ... but isn't it lanthanIDES and actinIDES? You know, like Caesar's death? I kind of hate to sound pedantic, and I hate far more that it took me a few weeks to notice this … but isn’t it lanthanIDES and actinIDES? You know, like Caesar’s death?

]]> By: Quirk http://www.hrsfans.org/2009/11/15/periodic-table/comment-page-1/#comment-5394 Quirk Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:33:50 +0000 http://www.hrsfans.org/?p=407#comment-5394 Woo--covetousness Woo–covetousness

]]>